Themes and tags

acline's picture

Here's a quick review of the five themes I'm following in my long-form analyses of the interviews and the tags [tags] that will indicate each (subject to change):

1. Perceptions of the danger Iraq posed to the U.S. and the Middle East. [danger]
2. The voice of debate: who was covered; who was ignored. [voice]
3. Motives of political and journalistic actors as portrayed by those actors. [motive]
4. Arguments for war as given and portrayed. [argument]
5. Journalistic practice in regard to covering civic actors (including journalists). [practice]

[Note: I have edited #5.]

kentbye's picture

Are 5 Themes Enough?

Cool -- Are you going to expand on your 5 themes as you read through all of the other interviews?

I may only have time to cover 7-10 themes in the final film, but I made the interviews and subjects as broad as possible in order to transcend the narrative bias that the media usually falls into.

So I probably have at least 20-30 themes, and the spillover can happen with short vignettes that can be posted online and as DVD extras.

It'll be interesting to make both of our themes more explicit when I get the custom tagging module up and running.

Using a large number of themes gives me more flexibility in the editing, and this broad focus can be narrowed by the open source community of volunteers as well.

I also decided to take a much broader focus on this topic than the media did. There were a lot of perspectives not heard in the daily build-up to war, and I was trying to demonstrate that there were perspectives that didn't fall into the trap of massive groupthink.

Ultimately, I've been trying to take a more holistic approach to this topic which means that I analyzed a number of angles from the political, cultural and journalistic perspectives.

I have attempted to limit the time period from 8/26/02 to 3/19/03 -- but the political context of our Iraq policy goes back for many decades and is difficult to take a completely reductionistic approach.

But it is my intention to focus on this time period for the final film.

acline's picture

no set # exists

I don't plan to limit the number to five. I have no number in mind. These first five appeared to me to be the most important following the Plante analysis. I'm simply going to use them as a guide as I move through the interview. I'll add, subtract, and edit as I go.

At least three of these five seem to me to be excellent candidates for your final cut. I'll the answer to the obvious question open for a while :-)

-------
Andrew R. Cline, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Journalism
Missouri State University
The Rhetorica Network
rhetorica.net

kentbye's picture

Sounds good

You start at the top. I'll start at the bottom. We'll meet up halfway.

It looks like your five themes could be considered a taxonomy, and it'll be interesting to see how much overlap you have with these themes.

When the Drupal module is set up to document the folksonomy/taxonomy tags for each soundbite, then this type of overlap will become much clearer.

I started to organize my footage in Final Cut Pro according to a strict hierarchy with soundbites located in one thematic folder. And then I started to forget which folder I stored the file in, and it wasn't very useful.

Hopefully, a more informal folksonomy will help solve this problem by storing tags in Final Cut Pro's metadata fields like "Comment," "Log Notes," "Reel/Take," and about 10 other fields.

I'm playing with this technique in FCP a little bit at the moment.

But it'll be interesting to see what other themes emerges from free tagging soundbites with multiple tags.